Adapting Requirements Models to Varying EnvironmentsTechnical
The engineering of high-quality software requirements generally relies on properties and assumptions about the environment in which the software-to-be has to operate. Such properties and assumptions, referred to as environment conditions in this paper, are highly subject to changes over time or from one software variant to another. As a consequence, the requirements engineered for a specific set of environment conditions may no longer be adequate, complete and consistent for another set.
The paper addresses this problem through an automated requirements adaptation technique. A formal requirements modelling framework is considered to make requirements refinements and dependencies on environment conditions explicit. When environment conditions change, an adapted requirements model is computed that is correct with respect to the new environment conditions. The space of possible adaptations is not fixed a priori; the required changes are expected to meet one or more environment-independent goal(s) to be satisfied in both system versions. The adapted requirements model is generated using a new counterexample-guided learning procedure that ensures the correctness of the updated requirements, giving preference to least costly adaptations.
Tue 7 JulDisplayed time zone: (UTC) Coordinated Universal Time change
16:05 - 17:05 | A4-Cyber-Physical SystemsSoftware Engineering in Practice / Technical Papers / Demonstrations at Baekje Chair(s): Joanne M. Atlee University of Waterloo | ||
16:05 12mTalk | Adapting Requirements Models to Varying EnvironmentsTechnical Technical Papers Dalal Alrajeh Imperial College London, Antoine Cailliau ICTEAM, UCLouvain, Axel van Lamsweerde Université catholique de Louvain | ||
16:17 12mTalk | Comparing Formal Tools for System Design: a Judgment StudyTechnical Technical Papers Alessio Ferrari CNR-ISTI, Franco Mazzanti ISTI-CNR, Davide Basile University of Florence, Maurice H. ter Beek ISTI-CNR, Alessandro Fantechi University of Florence DOI Pre-print | ||
16:29 3mTalk | Demo: SLEMI: Finding Simulink Compiler Bugs through Equivalence Modulo Input (EMI)Demo Demonstrations Shafiul Azam Chowdhury University of Texas at Arlington, Sohil Lal Shrestha The University of Texas at Arlington, Taylor T Johnson Vanderbilt University, Christoph Csallner University of Texas at Arlington Link to publication DOI Media Attached | ||
16:32 12mTalk | The Forgotten Case of the Dependency Bugs: On the Example of the Robot Operating SystemSEIP Software Engineering in Practice Anders Fischer-Nielsen IT University of Copenhagen, Zhoulai Fu IT University of Copenhagen, Denmark, Ting Su ETH Zurich, Switzerland, Andrzej Wąsowski IT University of Copenhagen, Denmark Pre-print | ||
16:44 3mTalk | PROMISE: High-Level Mission Specification for Multiple RobotsDemo Demonstrations Sergio Garcia Chalmers | University of Gothenburg, Patrizio Pelliccione University of L'Aquila and Chalmers | University of Gothenburg, Claudio Menghi University of Luxembourg, Thorsten Berger Chalmers | University of Gothenburg, Tomas Bures Charles University, Czech Republic | ||
16:47 12mTalk | How do you Architect your Robots? State of the Practice and Guidelines for ROS-based SystemsSEIP Software Engineering in Practice Ivano Malavolta Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Grace Lewis Carnegie Mellon Software Engineering Institute, Bradley Schmerl Carnegie Mellon University, USA, Patricia Lago Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, David Garlan Carnegie Mellon University |