A Mixed Methods Research Agenda to Identify Undergraduate Misconceptions in Software Engineering, Lecturers' Handling, and Didactical Implications
Due to the growing value of software technology in our everyday life, young professionals and undergraduates need to be well-qualified for Software Engineering (SE) careers. Additionally, its didactic basis is a recent development. The use of software in everyday life in different contexts can invoke preconceptions about informatics, programming and SE. As a consequence, freshmen students do not enter university as “blank sheets” [1, p. 58]. They have formed preconceptions, which represent conceptions someone has gained before confronted with factual issues. These can be used as “points of departure” for teaching in a “positive” way or should be addressed to reduce obstacles, if detected as so-called misconceptions (MCs). MCs are individual conceptions that are “at odds with modern scientific theories” [12, p. 2] and thus can be an epistemological learning obstacle [7]. To be able to use or address these conceptions in teaching and learning contexts in higher education, they must be elicited and evaluated in advance. Therefore, this paper covers a mixed methods research agenda to combine undergraduates’ MCs in SE, lecturers’ handling, and implications.